In Re Jhon Scott Smout, Relator v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Jhon Scott Smout, Relator v. the State of Texas (In Re Jhon Scott Smout, Relator v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00278-CR No. 07-26-00279-CR
IN RE JHON SCOTT SMOUT, RELATOR
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
May 22, 2026 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Relator, John Scott Smout, has two criminal appeals presently pending before this
Court. 1 He has now filed two petitions for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court
compel his trial counsel and the State of Texas to produce all exculpatory evidence
related to those criminal proceedings. We dismiss his petition for want of jurisdiction.
We have authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county
court in our appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 22.221(a), (b). Smout does not request mandamus relief against a
district or county judge and has not demonstrated how issuance of the requested writ
1 Those appeals are docketed in cause numbers 07-26-00036-CR and 07-26-00037-CR. against his former counsel or the district attorney’s office is necessary to enforce our
jurisdiction. Consequently, we are without authority to issue said writ. See In re Oluma,
No. 14-25-00144-CR, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 1585, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.]
Mar. 11, 2025, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (holding that an appellate court “lacks
authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a district attorney or assistant district
attorneys.”); In re Youngstrom, No. 07-14-00210-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6528, at *1–
2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo June 16, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing petition for writ of
mandamus against former appellate counsel for want of jurisdiction).
Accordingly, Smout’s petitions for writ of mandamus are dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Jhon Scott Smout, Relator v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jhon-scott-smout-relator-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.