In Re: J.G.H.,Jr., dob 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age James And Teri Wolfe v. Jennifer Lynn Duckhorn - Dissenting

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

In Re: J.G.H.,Jr., dob 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age James And Teri Wolfe v. Jennifer Lynn Duckhorn - Dissenting

DecidedAugust 17, 2009

DocketW2008-01913-COA-R3-PT

StatusPublished

This text of In Re: J.G.H.,Jr., dob 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age James And Teri Wolfe v. Jennifer Lynn Duckhorn - Dissenting (In Re: J.G.H.,Jr., dob 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age James And Teri Wolfe v. Jennifer Lynn Duckhorn - Dissenting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re: J.G.H.,Jr., dob 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age James And Teri Wolfe v. Jennifer Lynn Duckhorn - Dissenting, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON FEBRUARY 17, 2009 Session

IN RE: J. G. H., Jr., DOB 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age JAMES and TERI WOLFE v. JENNIFER LYNN DUCKHORN Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. S3119 Herbert Lane, Special Judge

No. W2008-01913-COA-R3-PT - Filed August 17, 2009

J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J., DISSENTING:

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. It is my belief that the same procedure was utilized in this case as was used for the appointment of the special judge in the case of State of Tennessee Department of Children’s Services v. Ruth Sails, et al., No. W2008-01352-COA-R3-PT, 2009 Tenn. App., LEXIS 431 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 10, 2009) (Stafford, J., dissenting). Consequently I believe that the special judge was not appointed in conformity with the statutory and case law and should not be considered a special judge. I am of the opinion that all action taken by the special judge in this case is a nullity. I hereby adopt and reiterate the reasoning set out in the dissenting opinion in the Sails case. I would remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion

___________________________________ J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON FEBRUARY 17, 2009 Session

IN RE: J. G. H., Jr., DOB 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age JAMES and TERI WOLFE v. JENNIFER LYNN DUCKHORN Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. S3119 Herbert Lane, Special Judge

No. W2008-01913-COA-R3-PT - Filed August 17, 2009

J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J., DISSENTING:

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. It is my belief that the same procedure was utilized in this case as was used for the appointment of the special judge in the case of State of Tennessee Department of Children’s Services v. Ruth Sails, et al., No. W2008-01352-COA-R3-PT, 2009 Tenn. App., LEXIS 431 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 10, 2009) (Stafford, J., dissenting). Consequently I believe that the special judge was not appointed in conformity with the statutory and case law and should not be considered a special judge. I am of the opinion that all action taken by the special judge in this case is a nullity. I hereby adopt and reiterate the reasoning set out in the dissenting opinion in the Sails case. I would remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion

___________________________________ J. STEVEN STAFFORD, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re: J.G.H.,Jr., dob 11/04/05, A Child Under 18 Years of Age James And Teri Wolfe v. Jennifer Lynn Duckhorn - Dissenting, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jghjr-dob-110405-a-child-under-18-years-of-a-tennctapp-2009.