In re Jewell

Montana Supreme Court

In re Jewell

212 P. 1117, 62 Mont. 611

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Jewell. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 Mont. 602 →

Montana Supreme Court·Decided January 4, 1922·No. No. 4,859·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Now onthis day comes John Jacob Jewell, and through L. A. Foot, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, presents his petition for reinstatement to the bar of this court. Whereupon, on consideration, it is found that the said John Jacob Jewell has complied with the requirements laid down at the time of his suspension relative to his reinstatement (see In re Jewell, 60 Mont. 602, 201 Pac. 266), and the necessary time having elapsed, it is .ordered that he be, and he is hereby, reinstated in his office as an attorney and counselor at law in all the courts of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Now onthis day comes John Jacob Jewell, and through L. A. Foot, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, presents his petition for reinstatement to the bar of this court. Whereupon, on consideration, it is found that the said John Jacob Jewell has complied with the requirements laid down at the time of his suspension relative to his reinstatement (see In re Jewell, 60 Mont. 602, 201 Pac. 266), and the necessary time having elapsed, it is .ordered that he be, and he is hereby, reinstated in his office as an attorney and counselor at law in all the courts of this state.

In re Jewell, 212 P. 1117, 62 Mont. 611 (Mo. 1922).

Pincite

212 P. 1117 (In re Jewell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related