In re Jewell

Montana Supreme Court

In re Jewell

212 P. 1117, 62 Mont. 611

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 4, 1922

DocketNo. 4,859

StatusPublished

This text of 212 P. 1117 (In re Jewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jewell, 212 P. 1117, 62 Mont. 611 (Mo. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Now onthis day comes John Jacob Jewell, and through L. A. Foot, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, presents his petition for reinstatement to the bar of this court. Whereupon, on consideration, it is found that the said John Jacob Jewell has complied with the requirements laid down at the time of his suspension relative to his reinstatement (see In re Jewell, 60 Mont. 602, 201 Pac. 266), and the necessary time having elapsed, it is .ordered that he be, and he is hereby, reinstated in his office as an attorney and counselor at law in all the courts of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Now onthis day comes John Jacob Jewell, and through L. A. Foot, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, presents his petition for reinstatement to the bar of this court. Whereupon, on consideration, it is found that the said John Jacob Jewell has complied with the requirements laid down at the time of his suspension relative to his reinstatement (see In re Jewell, 60 Mont. 602, 201 Pac. 266), and the necessary time having elapsed, it is .ordered that he be, and he is hereby, reinstated in his office as an attorney and counselor at law in all the courts of this state.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 P. 1117, 62 Mont. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jewell-mont-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack