in Re Jesus Cruz and Juan Sanchez
This text of in Re Jesus Cruz and Juan Sanchez (in Re Jesus Cruz and Juan Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 27, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00166-CV ——————————— IN RE JESUS CRUZ AND JUAN SANCHEZ, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 28, 2013, relators, Jesus Cruz and Juan Sanchez, filed a petition
for writ of mandamus, seeking relief from the trial court’s February 14, 2013 order
compelling relators to submit to independent medical examinations and the trial
court’s February 14, 2013 order denying relators’ motion to compel discovery of net-worth information from real party in interest, T. Gerald Treece, Independent
Executor of the Estate of John M. O’Quinn, deceased (the “Estate”).1
Subsequently, the parties advised the Court that, on March 6, 2013, the trial
court vacated its February 14, 2013 net-worth order and issued a new order
denying relators’ motion to compel discovery of net-worth information from the
Estate. In light of the trial court’s March 6, 2013 order, relators filed a motion for
leave to supplement their petition, seeking to challenge the trial court’s March 6,
2013 net-worth order in this mandamus proceeding. Further, relators requested
that the Court construe their reply brief as a supplement to their petition for writ of
mandamus and consider their arguments related to the March 6, 2013 net-worth
order. The Court grants relators’ motion for leave to supplement and will consider
relators’ reply brief, which addresses the trial court’s March 6, 2013 net-worth
order, as the supplement to relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
Relators have also now filed a partial motion to dismiss, asserting that the
issue raised concerning the independent medical examinations is moot and
requesting that the court dismiss that portion of relators’ mandamus proceeding.
1 The underlying case is Tory House et al. v. The O’Quinn Law Firm, John M. O’Quinn & Associates, LLP, T. Gerald Treece, as Independent Executor and Representative of the Estate of John M. O’Quinn, deceased and Abel Manji, No. 392247-404, in the Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Mike Wood presiding.
2 Accordingly, we grant relators’ partial motion to dismiss. Cf. TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(1). As supplemented, the remainder of the petition for writ of
mandamus is denied. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jesus Cruz and Juan Sanchez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jesus-cruz-and-juan-sanchez-texapp-2014.