In re Jesus B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jesus B.

189 A.D.2d 653

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 A.D.2d 653 (In re Jesus B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jesus B., 189 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jeffry Gallet, J., at fact-finding hearing; Michael Gage, J., at dispositional hearing) entered October 8, 1991, which inter alia, terminated the parental rights of respondent John B., upon a finding that respondent had permanently neglected the child and which awarded custody to St. Christopher-Ottilie agency for adoption purposes, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given that the child has never resided with respondent but with the same foster family since birth, and in view of respondent’s failure to plan for the child’s future, we agree with Family Court that termination of respondent’s parental [654]*654rights is in the best interests of the child. (See, Matter of Susana R., 182 AD2d 423.)

We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review and without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jeffry Gallet, J., at fact-finding hearing; Michael Gage, J., at dispositional hearing) entered October 8, 1991, which inter alia, terminated the parental rights of respondent John B., upon a finding that respondent had permanently neglected the child and which awarded custody to St. Christopher-Ottilie agency for adoption purposes, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given that the child has never resided with respondent but with the same foster family since birth, and in view of respondent’s failure to plan for the child’s future, we agree with Family Court that termination of respondent’s parental [654]*654rights is in the best interests of the child. (See, Matter of Susana R., 182 AD2d 423.)

We have considered respondent’s remaining arguments and find them to be unpreserved for appellate review and without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jesus-b-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack