In re Jessina O.
89 A.D.3d 736, 931 N.Y.2d 900
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 2011·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[737] The mother’s challenges to the order of disposition are academic inasmuch as the order has expired by its own terms and has been superseded by a subsequent final order awarding custody of the subject children to the father (see Matter of Luis O. v Jessica S., 89 AD3d 735 [2011] [decided herewith]; Matter of Alanie H., 83 AD3d 1066 [2011]; Matter of Jacob SS., 59 AD3d 825 [2009]; Matter of Andrew Y., 44 AD3d 1063 [2007]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Jessina O., 89 A.D.3d 736, 931 N.Y.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 736 (In re Jessina O.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Angelina K. (Jessica W.)
140 A.D.3d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Yu F. (Fen W.)
122 A.D.3d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Luis O. v. Jessica S.
89 A.D.3d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)