In re Jessina O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jessina O.

89 A.D.3d 736, 931 N.Y.2d 900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 89 A.D.3d 736 (In re Jessina O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jessina O., 89 A.D.3d 736, 931 N.Y.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[737]*737The mother’s challenges to the order of disposition are academic inasmuch as the order has expired by its own terms and has been superseded by a subsequent final order awarding custody of the subject children to the father (see Matter of Luis O. v Jessica S., 89 AD3d 735 [2011] [decided herewith]; Matter of Alanie H., 83 AD3d 1066 [2011]; Matter of Jacob SS., 59 AD3d 825 [2009]; Matter of Andrew Y., 44 AD3d 1063 [2007]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[737]*737The mother’s challenges to the order of disposition are academic inasmuch as the order has expired by its own terms and has been superseded by a subsequent final order awarding custody of the subject children to the father (see Matter of Luis O. v Jessica S., 89 AD3d 735 [2011] [decided herewith]; Matter of Alanie H., 83 AD3d 1066 [2011]; Matter of Jacob SS., 59 AD3d 825 [2009]; Matter of Andrew Y., 44 AD3d 1063 [2007]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.3d 736, 931 N.Y.2d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jessina-o-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack