In re Jessica R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jessica R.

83 A.D.3d 527, 920 N.Y.S.2d 666

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 83 A.D.3d 527 (In re Jessica R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jessica R., 83 A.D.3d 527, 920 N.Y.S.2d 666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about March 25, 2010, which, after a fact-finding hearing, granted petitioner’s motion for summary judgment finding that respondent father had severely abused his biological daughter, and released the child to the custody of her nonparty mother without supervision, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by the father’s assigned counsel to be relieved as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed the record and agree with the father’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about March 25, 2010, which, after a fact-finding hearing, granted petitioner’s motion for summary judgment finding that respondent father had severely abused his biological daughter, and released the child to the custody of her nonparty mother without supervision, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by the father’s assigned counsel to be relieved as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed the record and agree with the father’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.3d 527, 920 N.Y.S.2d 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jessica-r-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack