in Re Jesse Mendez
This text of in Re Jesse Mendez (in Re Jesse Mendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00399-CR
IN RE Jesse MENDEZ
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 2, 2008
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator Jesse Mendez has filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to
compel the trial court to “set-aside with prejudice” four “pending criminal felony indictments due
to excessive delay.” Relator asserts his right to a speedy trial has been violated. Trial court records
show relator is represented by counsel. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick
v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1981); Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]1994, orig.
proceeding). Accordingly, the petition is denied.
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2006-CR-3125, 2006-CR-3128-B, 2006-CR-6116, 2006-CR-6117-A, styled State of Texas v. Jesse Mendez, pending in the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jesse Mendez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jesse-mendez-texapp-2008.