in Re Jesse Andrew Lopez
This text of in Re Jesse Andrew Lopez (in Re Jesse Andrew Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 7, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00515-CR ——————————— IN RE JESSE ANDREW LOPEZ, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Jesse Andrew Lopez, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus,
challenging the trial court’s oral rulings on discovery matters and asserting that the
trial court has refused to rule on relator’s written motions and a petition for a writ of
habeas corpus seeking discovery.1 This Court’s records reflect that, after relator
1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Jesse Andrew Lopez, case number 17-DCR-077033, in the 268th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Brady G. Elliott presiding. filed his petition, the trial court signed an “Order on Defendant’s Pretrial Motions
and Discovery.”2
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition as moot. See In re Bonilla, 424 S.W.3d
528, 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). We also dismiss as moot relator’s motions for a
stay of the trial in the underlying proceeding and any other pending motions.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2 An appellate court may take judicial notice of its own records in a related proceeding involving the same parties. See In re Chaumette, 456 S.W.3d 299, 303 n.2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, orig. proceeding). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jesse Andrew Lopez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jesse-andrew-lopez-texapp-2018.