in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 3, 2003
Docket14-03-00702-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall (in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed July 3, 2003

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed July 3, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00702-CV

IN RE JERRY WAYNE WIGFALL, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

On June 23, 2003, relator, Jerry Wayne Wigfall, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221;  Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In his petition, he seeks to have this Court compel the trial court to order the preparation of the reporter=s record for his appeal at no cost.  Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal.  See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 739 (Tex. 1998) (holding amended rules of appellate procedure provide adequate appellate remedy precluding mandamus relief to obtain a free record for appeal).

We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Opinion filed July 3, 2003.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Arroyo
988 S.W.2d 737 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerry-wayne-wigfall-texapp-2003.