in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall
This text of in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall (in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed July 3, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00702-CV
IN RE JERRY WAYNE WIGFALL, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On June 23, 2003, relator, Jerry Wayne Wigfall, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221; Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, he seeks to have this Court compel the trial court to order the preparation of the reporter=s record for his appeal at no cost. Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 739 (Tex. 1998) (holding amended rules of appellate procedure provide adequate appellate remedy precluding mandamus relief to obtain a free record for appeal).
We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Opinion filed July 3, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jerry Wayne Wigfall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerry-wayne-wigfall-texapp-2003.