in Re Jerry Wanzer, Relator

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 04-11-00213-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00213-CV

IN RE Jerry WANZER

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 6, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On March 23, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel

“TDCJ-ID John B. Connally Unit prison officials to perform a ministerial function by returning

his legal material.” Relator also filed a “motion requesting a preliminary injunction/TRO.”

However, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. By statute, this court

has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the

court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). We conclude the writ is not necessary to

enforce our jurisdiction. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED

1 There is no underlying proceeding or trial court listed in relator’s petition. 04-11-00213-CV

FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION and the “motion requesting a preliminary injunction/TRO” is

DENIED.

Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of

Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Jerry Wanzer, Relator, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

in Re Jerry Wanzer, Relator (in Re Jerry Wanzer, Relator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.