in Re Jerry Wanzer, Relator
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00213-CV
IN RE Jerry WANZER
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 6, 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On March 23, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to compel
“TDCJ-ID John B. Connally Unit prison officials to perform a ministerial function by returning
his legal material.” Relator also filed a “motion requesting a preliminary injunction/TRO.”
However, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. By statute, this court
has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the
court of appeals district” and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004). We conclude the writ is not necessary to
enforce our jurisdiction. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED
1 There is no underlying proceeding or trial court listed in relator’s petition. 04-11-00213-CV
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION and the “motion requesting a preliminary injunction/TRO” is
DENIED.
Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of
Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX. R.
APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Jerry Wanzer, Relator (in Re Jerry Wanzer, Relator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.