In Re Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as Sole Heirs and Personal Representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as Sole Heirs and Personal Representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 5, 2025·No. 04-25-00130-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00130-CV

IN RE Jerry RUMFIELD and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as sole heirs and personal representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM

Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 5, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On February 25, 2025, relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay.

After considering the mandamus petition and record, this court concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ emergency motion for stay is DENIED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 21-07-0572-CVA, styled Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as sole heirs and personal representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. Jimmy G. Garza, pending in the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, the Honorable Jennifer M. Dillingham presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00130-CV

IN RE Jerry RUMFIELD and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as sole heirs and personal representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM

Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 5, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On February 25, 2025, relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay.

After considering the mandamus petition and record, this court concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ emergency motion for stay is DENIED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 21-07-0572-CVA, styled Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as sole heirs and personal representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. Jimmy G. Garza, pending in the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, the Honorable Jennifer M. Dillingham presiding.

In Re Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as Sole Heirs and Personal Representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as Sole Heirs and Personal Representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. the State of Texas (In Re Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as Sole Heirs and Personal Representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.