in Re Jerry Ricky Hannah

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 24, 2011
Docket14-11-00201-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Jerry Ricky Hannah (in Re Jerry Ricky Hannah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Jerry Ricky Hannah, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 24, 2011

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-11-00201-CR

In Re Jerry Ricky Hannah, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

On March 9, 2011, relator Jerry Ricky Hannah filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Ruben Guerrero, presiding judge of the 174th District Court of Harris County to vacate relator’s conviction.  Relator was convicted for failure to comply with a civil commitment order.  This court affirmed his conviction.  Hannah v. State, 14-09-00283-CR; 2010 WL 1790807 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 6, 2010, pet. ref’d) (memo. op.).

This court’s original jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code.  Section 22.221 expressly limits the original jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to:  (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction.  Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. 

The substance of the relief sought by relator in his petition is habeas corpus relief following a final felony conviction.  See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.045(b) (offense under this section is a felony of the third degree).  Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction.  Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).  Such an application for writ of habeas corpus is returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals.  The court of appeals does not have jurisdiction.  Id.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and McCally.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Pardons & Paroles Ex Rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
910 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Jerry Ricky Hannah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerry-ricky-hannah-texapp-2011.