in Re Jerry R. Crandall and Erlinda v. Soto
This text of in Re Jerry R. Crandall and Erlinda v. Soto (in Re Jerry R. Crandall and Erlinda v. Soto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00067-CV
IN RE JERRY R. CRANDALL AND ERLINDA V. SOTO
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 11, 2009
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On February 2, 2009, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for
emergency stay. The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the
opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of
mandamus and the motion for emergency stay are DENIED. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).
… This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CI-15946 pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, 1
Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Andy Mireles presiding. However, the challenged order was signed by the Honorable Larry Noll, presiding judge of the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jerry R. Crandall and Erlinda v. Soto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerry-r-crandall-and-erlinda-v-soto-texapp-2009.