In re Jerry D.
This text of 110 A.D.2d 635 (In re Jerry D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant’s admission was properly taken pursuant to a knowing and voluntary waiver of his rights, and appellant was fully aware that his admission might subject him to the disposition actually ordered. Further, a preponderance of the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing establishes that the order placing appellant provided the least restrictive available alternative (Family Ct Act § 352.2). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.2d 635, 487 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerry-d-nyappdiv-1985.