In re Jerry D.
110 A.D.2d 635, 487 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48534
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The appellant’s admission was properly taken pursuant to a knowing and voluntary waiver of his rights, and appellant was fully aware that his admission might subject him to the disposition actually ordered. Further, a preponderance of the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing establishes that the order placing appellant provided the least restrictive available alternative (Family Ct Act § 352.2). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Jerry D., 110 A.D.2d 635, 487 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 635 (In re Jerry D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Alphonso W.
8 A.D.3d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Andrew MM.
187 A.D.2d 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)