In Re: Jerome McFadden v.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2013·No. 13-1540·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1540

In re: JEROME MCFADDEN, Petitioner.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:12-cv-01627-MGL)

Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome McFadden, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome McFadden petitions for a writ of prohibition, seeking an order directing prison guards to cease retaliatory conduct against him. We conclude that McFadden is not entitled to the requested relief. A writ of prohibition is a drastic remedy that should be granted only where the petitioner’s right to such relief is clear and indisputable. In re Vargas, 723 F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983). As that is not the case here, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Jerome McFadden v., (4th Cir. 2013).

In Re: Jerome McFadden v. (In Re: Jerome McFadden v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related