In Re: Jerome McFadden v.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 3, 2013
Docket13-1540
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Jerome McFadden v. (In Re: Jerome McFadden v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Jerome McFadden v., (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1540

In re: JEROME MCFADDEN,

Petitioner.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:12-cv-01627-MGL)

Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 3, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome McFadden, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jerome McFadden petitions for a writ of prohibition,

seeking an order directing prison guards to cease retaliatory

conduct against him. We conclude that McFadden is not entitled

to the requested relief. A writ of prohibition is a drastic

remedy that should be granted only where the petitioner’s right

to such relief is clear and indisputable. In re Vargas, 723

F.2d 1461, 1468 (10th Cir. 1983). As that is not the case here,

we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Jerome McFadden v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerome-mcfadden-v-ca4-2013.