in Re Jerome Jordan
This text of in Re Jerome Jordan (in Re Jerome Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 27, 2014
No. 04-14-00738-CR
IN RE Jerome JORDAN
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On October 22, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on October 27th, 2014.
_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of October, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CR7589, styled The State of Texas v. Jerome Jordan, pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr. presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jerome Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerome-jordan-texapp-2014.