In re Jermaine J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jermaine J.

194 A.D.2d 437, 599 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6277

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 437 (In re Jermaine J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jermaine J., 194 A.D.2d 437, 599 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered June 10, 1992, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted robbery in the first degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The victim was surrounded by a group of six youths. The appellant and another accomplice were identified an hour and 15 minutes later by the victim, while he rode in a police cruiser searching for the robbers. This testimony, which was presented during the fact-finding hearing, was found to be credible and was sufficient to prove the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Brown, 184 AD2d 282, lv denied 80 NY2d 927). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered June 10, 1992, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted robbery in the first degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The victim was surrounded by a group of six youths. The appellant and another accomplice were identified an hour and 15 minutes later by the victim, while he rode in a police cruiser searching for the robbers. This testimony, which was presented during the fact-finding hearing, was found to be credible and was sufficient to prove the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Brown, 184 AD2d 282, lv denied 80 NY2d 927). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 437, 599 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jermaine-j-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack