in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 29, 2002
Docket01-02-00823-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis (in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 29, 2002





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NO. 01-02-00823-CV



IN RE JERALD JEROME DAVIS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus



O P I N I O N

Relator, Jerald Jerome Davis, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge Oakley (1) has sustained a contest to his declaration of inability to pay costs, preventing him from proceeding as an indigent in appellate cause number 01-02-00673-CV, an appeal in this Court from trial court cause number 0152839, currently pending. The petition for writ of mandamus is unverified. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. The petition for writ of mandamus is not accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of the order complained of, nor accompanied by a certified or sworn record of every document that is material to relator's claim for relief that was filed in the underlying proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j), 52.7.

In In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. 1998), the Texas Supreme Court ruled that appeal was an adequate remedy if a party wished to complain about a trial court's order concerning indigency. Id. at 738. Review of such an order by mandamus is no longer available. Relator should address his complaints concerning indigency rulings by way of motions filed in the appropriate appellate proceeding. However, in the interest of judicial economy the Court has transferred the "Plaintiff's Writ of Mandamus" to the appeal file for consideration as a motion to proceed as a pauper in this Court as an issue ancillary to the appeal. See In re B.A.C., 4 S.W.3d 322, 323 n.3 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999) (Order).

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Schneider and Justices Nuchia and Radack.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1.

The Honorable Bruce D. Oakley, judge of the 234th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Arroyo
988 S.W.2d 737 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
In the Interest of B.A.C.
4 S.W.3d 322 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerald-jerome-davis-texapp-2002.