in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis
This text of in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis (in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 29, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00823-CV
IN RE JERALD JEROME DAVIS, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
O P I N I O N
Relator, Jerald Jerome Davis, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that Judge Oakley (1) has sustained a contest to his declaration of inability to pay costs, preventing him from proceeding as an indigent in appellate cause number 01-02-00673-CV, an appeal in this Court from trial court cause number 0152839, currently pending. The petition for writ of mandamus is unverified. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. The petition for writ of mandamus is not accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of the order complained of, nor accompanied by a certified or sworn record of every document that is material to relator's claim for relief that was filed in the underlying proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j), 52.7.
In In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. 1998), the Texas Supreme Court ruled that appeal was an adequate remedy if a party wished to complain about a trial court's order concerning indigency. Id. at 738. Review of such an order by mandamus is no longer available. Relator should address his complaints concerning indigency rulings by way of motions filed in the appropriate appellate proceeding. However, in the interest of judicial economy the Court has transferred the "Plaintiff's Writ of Mandamus" to the appeal file for consideration as a motion to proceed as a pauper in this Court as an issue ancillary to the appeal. See In re B.A.C., 4 S.W.3d 322, 323 n.3 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999) (Order).
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Schneider and Justices Nuchia and Radack.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jerald Jerome Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jerald-jerome-davis-texapp-2002.