In Re: Jennifer Fernandez
This text of In Re: Jennifer Fernandez (In Re: Jennifer Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
IN THE MATTER OF: JENNIFER : No. 106 WM 2020 FERNANDEZ MOTION FOR EXTENSION : PURSUANT TO RULE 311 :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2020, the Motion for Extension of
Admission to Practice Law Pursuant to Pa.B.A.R. 311(g) is GRANTED, IN PART. The
motion is deficient, in that it fails to offer any argument consistent with the standard
applicable to Rule 311 extensions. See Pa.B.A.R. 311(g) (specifying that the 30-month
term of a temporary Rule 311 admission may be extended only upon a showing of good
cause). Notwithstanding the motion’s deficiencies, Petitioner is GRANTED a limited
extension of her Rule 311 licensure to ensure the continuity of services provided by the
University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Civil Practice Clinic, Petitioner’s employer. In
order to afford Petitioner time to seek full admission to the Pennsylvania bar, her
temporary admission is extended until October 31, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Jennifer Fernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jennifer-fernandez-pa-2020.