In re Jeneba J. Ghatt

196 A.3d 887

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order from the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law; this court's September 25, 2018, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; the response thereto; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and respondent's D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed October 24, 2018, it is

ORDERED that Jeneba J. Ghatt is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to October 24, 2018. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 , 496 (D.C. 2010). In a reciprocal discipline case respondent may not re-litigate the factual findings made in the original jurisdiction, see In re Zdravkovich , 831 A.2d 964 , 969 (D.C. 2003), and respondent has failed to establish any basis under D.C. Bar R. XI § 11(c) to rebut the presumption of imposing reciprocal discipline.