In re Jeffrey V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jeffrey V.

265 A.D.2d 180, 696 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 180 (In re Jeffrey V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jeffrey V., 265 A.D.2d 180, 696 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about June 24, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of aggravated harassment in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Given those determinations, there was ample evidence from [181]*181which appellant’s guilt could be inferred. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about June 24, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of aggravated harassment in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Given those determinations, there was ample evidence from [181]*181which appellant’s guilt could be inferred. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 180, 696 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-v-nyappdiv-1999.