in Re: Jeffrey Ronald Thomas
This text of in Re: Jeffrey Ronald Thomas (in Re: Jeffrey Ronald Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 6, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00446-CV
IN RE JEFFREY RONALD THOMAS, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that respondent (1) has not made written rulings on all motions filed by relator in trial court cause number 887234. (2)
There are three prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court, namely: (1) the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2) the relator must make a demand for performance; and (3) the subject court must refuse that request. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Relator has not provided us with a record that shows that he made any request of the respondent to perform a nondiscretionary act that respondent refused.
The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Schneider, and Justices Nuchia and Radack.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jeffrey Ronald Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-ronald-thomas-texapp-2002.