in Re Jeffrey Michael Burns

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Jeffrey Michael Burns

DecidedDecember 18, 2003

Docket14-03-01240-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Jeffrey Michael Burns (in Re Jeffrey Michael Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Jeffrey Michael Burns, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2003

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-01240-CV

IN RE JEFFREY MICHAEL BURNS, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On November 12, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator challenges the trial court=s alleged grant of a protective order in favor of real parties in interest, Sachie A. Canales and Klitsas & Vercher.

Mandamus relief is available if the trial court abuses its discretion, either in resolving factual issues or in determining legal principles when there is no other adequate remedy by law. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839‑40 (Tex. 1992). Relator has not met his burden of establishing an abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Hudson, and Fowler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI