In re Jeffrey McG.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jeffrey McG.

8 A.D.3d 571, 778 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8730

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 571 (In re Jeffrey McG.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jeffrey McG., 8 A.D.3d 571, 778 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of an amended order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated October 1, 2002, as, upon the admission by Jeffrey McG. that he had violated a condition of probation, placed him in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The only issues raised by the appellant concern that portion of the amended order of disposition which placed him in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year for placement in a residential facility. Because the placement period has expired, the appeal is dismissed as academic (see Matter of Todd B., 4 AD3d 650 [2004]; Matter of Daniel V., 281 AD2d 485 [2001]; Matter of Randy SS., 226 AD2d 799 [1996]; see also Matter of Brandon S., 305 AD2d 609 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of an amended order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated October 1, 2002, as, upon the admission by Jeffrey McG. that he had violated a condition of probation, placed him in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The only issues raised by the appellant concern that portion of the amended order of disposition which placed him in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year for placement in a residential facility. Because the placement period has expired, the appeal is dismissed as academic (see Matter of Todd B., 4 AD3d 650 [2004]; Matter of Daniel V., 281 AD2d 485 [2001]; Matter of Randy SS., 226 AD2d 799 [1996]; see also Matter of Brandon S., 305 AD2d 609 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 571, 778 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-mcg-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack