In re Jeffrey M. Silow
This text of 175 A.3d 623 (In re Jeffrey M. Silow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the certified order annulling respondent’s license to practice law in the state of West Virginia; this, court’s October 10,2017, order temporarily suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why .the functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the show cause order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit; and it further appearing that respondent has failed to inform the District of Columbia bar of his current address, it is
ORDERED that Jeff Godfrey is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” cases); In re Cole, 809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 2002) (explaining that in unopposed reciprocal matters the “imposition of identical discipline should be close to automatic”). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for the purposes of reinstatement the time for reinstatement will not begin to run until such time as respondent files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 A.3d 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-m-silow-dc-2017.