in Re Jeffrey J. Rourke
This text of in Re Jeffrey J. Rourke (in Re Jeffrey J. Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Motion for Temporary Relief and Motion for Ruling on Motion for Temporary Relief Denied as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed January 16, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-08-01073-CV
IN RE JEFFREY K. ROURKE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On November 25, 2008, relator Jeffrey K. Rourke filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he contends the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to dismiss the underlying lawsuit for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004); Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator has also asked that we stay all underlying proceedings pending the resolution of his mandamus petition. We conclude that relator has not demonstrated his entitlement to the extraordinary remedy of a writ of mandamus. Therefore, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We also deny, as moot, relator=s request for temporary relief and AMotion for Ruling on Motion for Temporary Relief.@
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Boyce.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jeffrey J. Rourke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-j-rourke-texapp-2009.