In re Jeffrey C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jeffrey C.

43 A.D.3d 805, 842 N.Y.S.2d 431

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.3d 805 (In re Jeffrey C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jeffrey C., 43 A.D.3d 805, 842 N.Y.S.2d 431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Bronx County (Nelida Malave, J.), entered on or about May 11, 2006, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute two counts of assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent and placing him on probation, and in denying his requests for a person in need of supervision adjudication or an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. The court imposed the least restrictive alternative in view of appellant’s violent acts against members of his family, repeated truancy, inability to control his anger and general disobedience (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P, Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Bronx County (Nelida Malave, J.), entered on or about May 11, 2006, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute two counts of assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent and placing him on probation, and in denying his requests for a person in need of supervision adjudication or an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. The court imposed the least restrictive alternative in view of appellant’s violent acts against members of his family, repeated truancy, inability to control his anger and general disobedience (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P, Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.3d 805, 842 N.Y.S.2d 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-c-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack