In re Jeffrey C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jeffrey C.

122 A.D.2d 269, 505 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59610

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 28, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.2d 269 (In re Jeffrey C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jeffrey C., 122 A.D.2d 269, 505 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Auperin, J.), dated January 2, 1985, which, upon a fact-finding order entered October 31, 1984, made after a hearing, finding that appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of robbery [270]*270in the first degree, placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order entered October 31, 1984.

Order of disposition affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court committed no error in excluding certain statements which were offered for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of a complaining witness. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Auperin, J.), dated January 2, 1985, which, upon a fact-finding order entered October 31, 1984, made after a hearing, finding that appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of robbery [270]*270in the first degree, placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order entered October 31, 1984.

Order of disposition affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The trial court committed no error in excluding certain statements which were offered for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of a complaining witness. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 269, 505 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-c-nyappdiv-1986.