in Re: Jeffrey Baron
This text of in Re: Jeffrey Baron (in Re: Jeffrey Baron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed February 3, 2017.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01358-CV
IN RE JEFFREY BARON, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-11915
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Brown In this original proceeding, relator complains of the trial court’s denial of relator’s motion
to sever claims and request for separate trials. A writ of mandamus will issue to correct a clear
abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of
Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a);
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we
DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
161358F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jeffrey Baron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffrey-baron-texapp-2017.