in Re Jeffery Wayne Blackburn

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 21, 2020
Docket01-19-00627-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Jeffery Wayne Blackburn (in Re Jeffery Wayne Blackburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Jeffery Wayne Blackburn, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Opinion issued April 21, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00627-CV ——————————— IN RE JEFFERY WAYNE BLACKBURN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Jeffery Wayne Blackburn,1 has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

challenging two orders entered by the trial court striking certain counteraffidavits

1 The spelling of relator’s name varies throughout the record. Our style of the case is in accord with the trial court’s orders at issue in this original proceeding. See Owens v. Handyside, 478 S.W3d 172, 175, n.1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2015, pet. denied) (clarifying style of case); see also Strobel v. Marlow, 341 S.W.3d 470, 471 n.1 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2011, no pet.). concerning medical expenses.2 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 18.001. To be

entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show that the trial court clearly abused

its discretion and that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins.

Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–136 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relator has

not demonstrated that he lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. See Walker v. Packer,

827 S.W.2d 833, 842 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding) (holding “an appellate remedy

is not inadequate merely because it may involve more expense or delay than

obtaining an extraordinary writ”); see also In re Flores, No. 01-19-00484-CV, 2020

WL 425297, *2–3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 28, 2020, orig. proceeding)

(mem. op.) (denying relators’ petition for writ of mandamus challenging trial court’s

exclusion of counteraffidavits offered pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies

Code section 18.001).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a), (d). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Lloyd, and Hightower.

2 The underlying case is Belinda Lamonto and Linda Bendickson v. Jeffery Wayne Blackburn, Cause No. 2017-80112, in the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Strobel v. Marlow
341 S.W.3d 470 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Jeffery Wayne Blackburn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeffery-wayne-blackburn-texapp-2020.