in Re Jeffery Marx

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 3, 2022·No. 03-22-00449-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00449-CV

In re Jeffery Marx

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BURNET COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Jeffery Marx has filed a document, which we treat as a petition for writ of

mandamus based on the substance of his filing, complaining that the Burnet County district clerk

has failed to file certain documents. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Surgitek,

Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999). As an intermediate appellate

court, this Court has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless

necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, see Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(a); In re Washington,

7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding), and our jurisdiction

is not implicated here. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want

of jurisdiction. __________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: August 3, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Jeffery Marx, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Jeffery Marx (in Re Jeffery Marx) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel
997 S.W.2d 598 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)