In Re Jefferson Alliance, Inc.

841 So. 2d 15, 2002 La.App. 1 Cir. 0335, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 359, 2003 WL 463512
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 14, 2003
Docket2002 CA 0335
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 841 So. 2d 15 (In Re Jefferson Alliance, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jefferson Alliance, Inc., 841 So. 2d 15, 2002 La.App. 1 Cir. 0335, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 359, 2003 WL 463512 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

841 So.2d 15 (2003)

In re: JEFFERSON ALLIANCE, INC.

No. 2002 CA 0335.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

February 14, 2003.
Rehearing Denied March 24, 2003.

*16 Kurt C. Garcia, Metairie, for Appellant Jefferson Alliance, Inc.

R. Gray Sexton, Maris L. McCrory, Jennifer G. Magness, Baton Rouge, for Appellee Louisiana Board of Ethics.

Before: FOIL, McCLENDON and KLINE[*], JJ.

FOIL, J.

This appeal challenges a ruling of the Louisiana Board of Ethics decreeing that Jefferson Alliance, Inc., a citizen group organized for the primary purpose of endorsing candidates for political office and taking positions on ballot issues, is a "political committee" subject to the registration and reporting requirements of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act, La. R.S. 18:1481 et. seq. Jefferson Alliance argued that it did not meet the statutory definition of a "political committee" because it did not directly contribute money to a particular campaign, nor had it advertised on behalf of a candidate or participated in door-to-door campaigning. Instead, it urged, funds it received from its members in the form of dues, and profits it received from its annual awards banquet were used only to operate the organization, and these funds and expenditures fell outside the scope of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act.

The Board of Ethics disagreed, finding that Jefferson Alliance was a political committee because it was primarily organized to support or oppose political candidates and issues, and the organization had made expenditures and received contributions in excess of the statutory requirement in order to influence the outcome of elections in Jefferson Parish. The group, the Board concluded, was therefore subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the campaign finance law. The Board further imposed a $10,000.00 penalty for Jefferson Alliance's failure to file the necessary documents, but suspended that penalty upon the condition that Jefferson Alliance file the documents within 30 days of the finality of the Board's decision.

Jefferson Alliance contends the Board of Ethics erred in finding its operations fit the statutory definition of a political committee. Judicial review of rulings of the Board of Ethics is conducted in accordance with the Louisiana Administrative Procedure Act. Schmitt v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, XXXX-XXXX, p. 2 (La.App. 1 Cir. 3/28/01), 808 So.2d 524, 525. A reviewing court may reverse or modify the Board's decision if substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions or decisions are (1) in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; (2) in excess of the agency's statutory authority; (3) made upon unlawful procedure; (4) affected by other error of law; (5) arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion; or (6) not supported and sustainable by a preponderance of evidence *17 as determined by the reviewing court. La. R.S. 49:964 G; Schmitt v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 808 So.2d at 525.

Employing this standard of review, we conclude that the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Board's written reasons for judgment are correct. We adopt these reasons as our own and attach a copy thereof to this opinion. Furthermore, we find no merit to Jefferson Alliance's challenge to the penalty imposed by the Board, as that penalty will be suspended if the group files the requisite documents within 30 days of the finality of the Board's decision. Should Jefferson Alliance refuse to file the document within that time period, there would be a knowing violation of the law which would clearly subject Jefferson Alliance to penalties under La. R.S. 18:1505.4 A(1).

DECREE

Based on the foregoing, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to appellant, Jefferson Alliance.

AFFIRMED.

ATTACHMENT

LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS

Ethics Board Docket No. 2000-117

Date: November 27, 2001

RE: Jefferson Alliance, Inc.

The Louisiana Board of Ethics (the "Board"), at its August 16, 2001 meeting accepted a joint stipulation of facts with joint exhibits and, after the filing of briefs, at its September 19, 2001 meeting considered oral arguments in connection with a public hearing for the purpose of exploring the following:

CHARGES

1.

That Jefferson Alliance, Inc. may have violated Sections 1491.1 and 1505.1D of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act ("CFDA") (La. R.S. 18:1491.1 and 1505.1 D) by failing to register as a political committee for the years 1999 and 2000.

2.

That Jefferson Alliance, Inc. may have violated Section 1505.1A and/or B of the CFDA (La. R.S. 18:1505.1 A and/or B) by failing to file, for the years 1999 and 2000, the campaign finance disclosure reports required by the provisions of Section 1491.6 of the CFDA (La. R.S. 18:1491.6), including, but not limited to, reports required for the October 1999 election based upon its endorsement of candidates participating in that election.

I.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1.

Jefferson Alliance, Inc. is a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Louisiana on a membership basis.

2.

According to its Articles of Incorporation, Jefferson Alliance, Inc. is organized to further the common good and general welfare of the people of the community and bring about civic betterment and social improvements through the encouragement of good government.

3.

The primary activity of Jefferson Alliance, Inc. consists of conducting candidate and proposition forums, and Jefferson Alliance may issue endorsements of candidates or propositions. Other major activities *18 include town hall meetings and awards banquets.

4.

Members of Jefferson Alliance, Inc. pay annual dues. In 1999, Jefferson Alliance, Inc. had 46 members. In 2000, Jefferson Alliance, Inc. had 37 members. The dues assessment in both 1999 and 2000 was $20 per member.

5.

The original bylaws of Jefferson Alliance, Inc. provided as follows:

The Jefferson Alliance shall prepare an advertising campaign budget, allocate the cost of that budget among the candidates who are endorsed, and request these candidates to participate. A candidate's failure to contribute financially to this campaign will in no way jeopardize or affect our endorsement.
The public relations firm retained by Jefferson Alliance shall make a full accounting to each candidate who participated in the budget of the campaign, and make such accounting available to the public. The accounting shall show all money received, all money spent, how all money was spent and whether there is a refund and the extent of such refund to the candidates. Refunds to candidates shall be on a pro rata basis. The public relations firm shall make an accounting within the time limits prescribed by law under the campaign reporting laws. Further, the public relations firm shall timely file all necessary reports required by campaign reporting laws and the Election Reporting Compliance Committee shall report this fact to the president in writing when accomplished. In the event of non-compliance, the Election Reporting Compliance Committee shall accomplish the reporting procedure and report same to the president.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ourso
938 So. 2d 748 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
In Re Demuro
897 So. 2d 669 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
841 So. 2d 15, 2002 La.App. 1 Cir. 0335, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 359, 2003 WL 463512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jefferson-alliance-inc-lactapp-2003.