In re Jeanna D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jeanna D.

251 A.D.2d 207, 675 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7380

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 207 (In re Jeanna D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jeanna D., 251 A.D.2d 207, 675 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Family-Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about June 4, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed her with the Division for Youth for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Family-Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about June 4, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed her with the Division for Youth for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 207, 675 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeanna-d-nyappdiv-1998.