In re Jeanette C.

168 A.D.2d 351
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 18, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 168 A.D.2d 351 (In re Jeanette C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jeanette C., 168 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Leah Ruth Marks, J.), entered on or about May 12, 1988, which terminated respondent father’s parental rights of Christina Jeanette C. and awarded custody and guardianship of said child to the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of placing said child for adoption with her foster parents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent contends that petitioner failed to prove that it exercised diligent efforts to strengthen his relationship with his three-year-old child. To the contrary, the evidence clearly demonstrates that the agency diligently attempted to reunite respondent with his daughter, but that he failed to plan for her return and regularly failed to maintain contact with her, only visiting his child five times between December 1987 and October 1988, despite numerous scheduled visits. The agency repeatedly attempted to help respondent overcome his drug problem, a major barrier preventing discharge of his child from foster care, but respondent refused the agency’s aid. Notably, the agency also explored the possibility of placing respondent’s daughter with his sister, but she never formally decided to take Christina into her home.

Under the circumstances, in light of respondent’s failure to realistically plan for the future of his daughter and in light of his failure to regularly keep in contact with her, there was a sufficient basis to support a determination of permanent neglect. (Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136.) Moreover, the evidence establishes that the best interest of Christina would be served by a termination of respondent’s parental rights so that she can be freed for adoption by her foster parents, with whom Christina has lived for almost her entire life.

While respondent alternatively requests a suspended judg[352]*352ment, he has not demonstrated that he has taken any steps to ameliorate the conditions which led to Christina’s placement in the first place. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Janaya T. (Sarah T.)
2018 NY Slip Op 7176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
In Re the Guardianship of Dante Alexander W.
2017 NY Slip Op 1822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
In re Vonta M.
54 A.D.3d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Curtis Kayvon C.
305 A.D.2d 139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Abdel Kader H.
298 A.D.2d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re Michael Anthony Vincent J.
253 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Nassau County Department of Social Services ex rel. James M. v. Diana T.
207 A.D.2d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
In re Desmond Sinclair G.
202 A.D.2d 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
In re Luther S.
176 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re M. E.
174 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D.2d 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeanette-c-nyappdiv-1990.