In re J.E. CA4/2

Opinion

Filed 8/27/13 In re J.E. CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re J.E., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, E058603 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. J248419) v. OPINION J.E.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Brian D. Saunders,

Judge. Affirmed.

Andrea S. Bitar, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On February 7, 2013, J.E. was found in possession of a locking blade knife on her

high school campus when a security guard tackled her to the ground to separate her from

another student during a fight. J.E. was cited and released to her mother.

On March 12, 2013, the People filed a juvenile wardship petition under Welfare

and Institutions Code section 602, subdivision (a), alleging J.E. committed a felony by

possessing a locking blade knife on school grounds. (Pen. Code, § 626.10, subd. (a)(1))

On April 23, 2013, the juvenile court reduced the charge to a misdemeanor

pursuant to Penal Code section 17, subdivision (b). J.E. admitted the allegation and was

placed on juvenile probation. This appeal followed.

DISCUSSION

Upon J.E.’s request, this court appointed counsel to represent her. Counsel has

filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v.

California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], setting forth a statement

of the case and potential arguable issues. Counsel has also requested this court to

undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered J.E. an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which she has

not done. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have

conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

2 DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

RAMIREZ P. J.

We concur:

McKINSTER J.

RICHLI J.