in Re: JBS Carriers, Inc., and Connie Thomas
This text of in Re: JBS Carriers, Inc., and Connie Thomas (in Re: JBS Carriers, Inc., and Connie Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed November 22, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00359-CV
IN RE JBS CARRIERS, INC., AND CONNIE THOMAS, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-09792
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness In this original proceeding, relators challenge the trial court’s denial of their
special exceptions and motion for protection. Entitlement to mandamus relief
requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they
lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–
36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition and the
record, we conclude that relators have failed to show their entitlement to the relief
requested. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
210359F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: JBS Carriers, Inc., and Connie Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jbs-carriers-inc-and-connie-thomas-texapp-2021.