In re J.B.A.

946 N.E.2d 240, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 4, 2011·No. 2011-0257·Published

Opinion

Licking App. No. 10-CA-30, 2010-Ohio-6564. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III; cause held for the decision in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234; and briefing schedule stayed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and McGee Brown, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re J.B.A., 946 N.E.2d 240, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1481 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

946 N.E.2d 240 (In re J.B.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

In Re Smith, 1-07-58 (6-30-2008)

2008 Ohio 3234 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)

Opinion

Related