In re Jayvon L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jayvon L.

18 A.D.3d 292, 795 N.Y.S.2d 31, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5254

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 A.D.3d 292 (In re Jayvon L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jayvon L., 18 A.D.3d 292, 795 N.Y.S.2d 31, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark V Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 2, 2003, in child protective proceedings pursuant to article 10 of the Family Court Act, insofar as it found that respondent had severely and repeatedly abused the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of respondent’s plea of guilty to murder in the second degree on a depraved indifference theory for having inflicted the ultimately fatal traumatic and burn injuries upon the subject child’s sister, Inez, and the proven circumstance that this crime was committed while both Inez and the subject child were in respondent’s care and custody, the derivative finding that respondent severely and repeatedly abused the subject child was entirely correct (see Matter of Marino S., 100 NY2d 361, 373-376, [2003], cert denied 540 US 1059 [2003]).

We have reviewed respondent’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark V Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 2, 2003, in child protective proceedings pursuant to article 10 of the Family Court Act, insofar as it found that respondent had severely and repeatedly abused the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of respondent’s plea of guilty to murder in the second degree on a depraved indifference theory for having inflicted the ultimately fatal traumatic and burn injuries upon the subject child’s sister, Inez, and the proven circumstance that this crime was committed while both Inez and the subject child were in respondent’s care and custody, the derivative finding that respondent severely and repeatedly abused the subject child was entirely correct (see Matter of Marino S., 100 NY2d 361, 373-376, [2003], cert denied 540 US 1059 [2003]).

We have reviewed respondent’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 292, 795 N.Y.S.2d 31, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jayvon-l-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack