In re Jay

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Jay

668 A.2d 1082, 143 N.J. 128, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 23

DecidedJanuary 4, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 668 A.2d 1082 (In re Jay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jay, 668 A.2d 1082, 143 N.J. 128, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 23 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

CONSENT ORDER

THIS MATTER, having been opened to the Court by DAVID E. JOHNSON, JR., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with [129]*129the consent of the Respondent, Stuart W. Jay, of Camden, and Emmett E. Primas, Jr., respondent’s counsel, and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed to Respondent being temporarily suspended from the practice of law, together with the additional relief provided in this Order;

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Stuart W. Jay of Camden, admitted to practice in this State in 1987, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of the Court.

2. Stuart W. Jay is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension.

3. Stuart W. Jay shall comply with R. 1:20-20, governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI