in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-08-018-CV
IN RE JAVIER CERDA, CULLEN COX RELATORS
AND RICKEY TURNER
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)
The court has considered Relators’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed because Relators have no standing to challenge Real Party in Interest Wendy Davis’ eligibility to seek the nomination of the Democratic Party for State Senator of Texas, Senate District 10. E.g., Brown v. Todd , 53 S.W.3d 297, 302-05 (Tex. 2001); Holland v. Taylor , 153 Tex. 433, 435-36, 270 S.W.2d 219, 220-21 (1954); Yett v. Cook , 115 Tex. 205, 217-20, 281 S.W. 837, 841-42 (1926).
Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL A: CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 23, 2008
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner (in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.