in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 23, 2008
Docket02-08-00018-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner (in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-018-CV

IN RE JAVIER CERDA, CULLEN COX RELATORS

AND RICKEY TURNER

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)

The court has considered Relators’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed because Relators have no standing to challenge Real Party in Interest Wendy Davis’ eligibility to seek the nomination of the Democratic Party for State Senator of Texas, Senate District 10.   E.g., Brown v. Todd , 53 S.W.3d 297, 302-05 (Tex. 2001); Holland v. Taylor , 153 Tex. 433, 435-36, 270 S.W.2d 219, 220-21 (1954); Yett v. Cook , 115 Tex. 205, 217-20, 281 S.W. 837, 841-42 (1926).    

Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL  A:  CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  January 23, 2008  

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Todd
53 S.W.3d 297 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Holland v. Taylor
270 S.W.2d 219 (Texas Supreme Court, 1954)
W.D. Yett, Mayor v. Cook
281 S.W. 837 (Texas Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Javier Cerda, Cullen Cox and Rickey Turner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-javier-cerda-cullen-cox-and-rickey-turner-texapp-2008.