in Re: Jason Zeno
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 15, 2017
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01078-CV
IN RE JASON ZENO, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 296-5136707
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill In this original proceeding, relator asks this Court to issue a writ directing the district
clerk to file a motion for child support modification and a request to proceed in forma pauperis that relator purportedly sent to the district clerk for filing.
This Court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless it is necessary to enforce our own jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a) (court of appeals may only issue writ of mandamus against district and county judges or as necessary to enforce jurisdiction of appellate court); In re Wilkerson, No. 05-16-00322-CV, 2016 WL 1320815, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 5, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re Simpson, 997 S.W.2d 939, 939 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig. proceeding)). Relator has no appeal pending in this Court and, therefore, our jurisdiction is not in jeopardy.
Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
/Bill Whitehill/
BILL WHITEHILL
JUSTICE
171078F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Jason Zeno (in Re: Jason Zeno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.