in Re: Jason Zeno
This text of in Re: Jason Zeno (in Re: Jason Zeno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 15, 2017
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01078-CV
IN RE JASON ZENO, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-5136707
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill In this original proceeding, relator asks this Court to issue a writ directing the district
clerk to file a motion for child support modification and a request to proceed in forma pauperis
that relator purportedly sent to the district clerk for filing.
This Court does not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk
unless it is necessary to enforce our own jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a) (court of
appeals may only issue writ of mandamus against district and county judges or as necessary to
enforce jurisdiction of appellate court); In re Wilkerson, No. 05-16-00322-CV, 2016 WL
1320815, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 5, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re
Simpson, 997 S.W.2d 939, 939 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig. proceeding)). Relator has no
appeal pending in this Court and, therefore, our jurisdiction is not in jeopardy. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
171078F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jason Zeno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jason-zeno-texapp-2017.