in Re Jason Wayne McBride
This text of in Re Jason Wayne McBride (in Re Jason Wayne McBride) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00235-CV
In re Jason Wayne McBride
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Jason Wayne McBride has filed a petition for writ of mandamus
complaining that the trial court has failed to rule on numerous pro se motions. McBride bears
the burden to present this Court with a record sufficient to demonstrate his right to mandamus
relief. See In re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding)
(observing that mandamus record failed to establish that relator requested ruling or called motion
to trial court's attention and that “mere filing of a motion with a trial court clerk does not equate
to a request that the trial court rule on the motion”); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a) (requiring a
relator to file a record containing sworn copies “of every document that is material to [his] claim
for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”).
Accordingly, because McBride failed to provide a sufficient mandamus record,
his petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). __________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith
Filed: May 21, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jason Wayne McBride, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jason-wayne-mcbride-texapp-2021.