In re Jason G.

3 A.D.3d 340, 769 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 157
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 3 A.D.3d 340 (In re Jason G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jason G., 3 A.D.3d 340, 769 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara Schechter, J.), entered on or about December 7, 2001, which, insofar as appealed from, removed the subject children from respondent’s custody upon fact-finding determinations that respondent neglected the older child and derivatively neglected the younger child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that respondent neglected the older child on one occasion by hitting him on his legs with a belt causing bruises that required medical attention, and on another occasion by hitting him over his eye with a closed fist, also causing a noticeable bruise (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; see Matter of Rasheid A., 283 AD2d 372, 373 [2001], citing, inter alia, Matter of Alena O., 220 AD2d 358, 360 [1995]). No basis exists to disturb Family Court’s findings of credibility. The findings of excessive corporal punishment as to the older child support the finding of derivative neglect as to the younger child (see Matter of Terrell H., 197 AD2d 372 [1993]). We note the unchallenged evidence that respondent failed to cooperate with the rehabilitative service plan presented to her by petitioner’s caseworker immediately after the first incident, and reject respondent’s argument that the finding of derivative neglect is unwarranted since the punishment she inflicted was meant to protect the younger child against a physical threat posed by the older child. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Keith H.
113 A.D.3d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
In re Portret M.
47 A.D.3d 424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Fred Darryl B.
41 A.D.3d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Maria Raquel L.
36 A.D.3d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Poli K.
34 A.D.3d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Matter of L.M.
2006 NY Slip Op 51619(U) (Monroe Family Court, 2006)
Jacqueline Sharon L. v. Pamela G.
26 A.D.3d 250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.3d 340, 769 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jason-g-nyappdiv-2004.