In Re Jason

28 A.3d 339, 302 Conn. 924
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 14, 2011·No. SC 18847·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

28 A.3d 339 (2011)
302 Conn. 924

In re JASON R. et al.

SC 18847

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 14, 2011.

Erich H. Gaston, in support of the petition.

Tammy Nguyen-O'Dowd, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 746, 23 A.3d 18, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court, in this termination of parental rights case, did not shift *340 to the mother the burden of proof on the issue of personal rehabilitation?"

HARPER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Jason, 28 A.3d 339, 302 Conn. 924 (Colo. 2011).

28 A.3d 339 (In Re Jason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mangiafico v. State Board of Education
53 A.3d 1066 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
Selene Finance, L.P. v. Tornatore
46 A.3d 1070 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
In re Brian T.
38 A.3d 114 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
HERASIMOVICH v. Town of Wallingford
28 A.3d 339 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)