in Re: Jason Burrow

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: October 31, 2007
• Docket: 06-07-00130-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-07-00130-CV

IN RE: JASON BURROW

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jason Burrow has filed in this Court his petition for writ of mandamus asking that this Court compel the Smith County District Clerk and the trial judge of the 241st Judicial District Court of Smith County to perform what he claims are their respective duties regarding the filing of and ruling on his various pleadings.

We are without jurisdiction to entertain his petition. "Each court of appeals or a justice of a court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus and all other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court." Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (Vernon 2004). The authority of a court of appeals to do so is limited to its appellate district. ⁽¹⁾

Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(1), (2). The Sixth Court of Appeals District is composed of nineteen counties, none of those counties being Smith County. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.201(g) (Vernon Supp. 2007). Smith County lies within the Twelfth Court of Appeals District. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.201(m) (Vernon Supp. 2007). We, therefore, have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus in this case.

Accordingly, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: October 30, 2007

Date Decided: October 31, 2007

1. We also note that the Legislature has not conferred authority on this Court to issue a writ of mandamus generally, and we would not have the authority in the context of Burrow's allegations to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk. See In re Dunn, 120 S.W.3d 913 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2003, orig. proceeding).