In re Jason A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jason A.

301 A.D.2d 444, 752 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 503

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 301 A.D.2d 444 (In re Jason A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jason A., 301 A.D.2d 444, 752 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about May 30, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that [445]*445he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services in a limited secure facility for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence warranted the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the drug transaction (see People v Williams, 172 AD2d 448, affd 79 NY2d 803). Concur— Tom, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about May 30, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that [445]*445he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services in a limited secure facility for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence warranted the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the drug transaction (see People v Williams, 172 AD2d 448, affd 79 NY2d 803). Concur— Tom, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 A.D.2d 444, 752 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jason-a-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack