In re Jasmine M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jasmine M.

301 A.D.2d 479, 753 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 A.D.2d 479 (In re Jasmine M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jasmine M., 301 A.D.2d 479, 753 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Orders of disposition, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about September 2 and October 13, 1998, placing two of the subject children with their father under petitioner’s supervision and placing the third subject child with petitioner for up to one year, upon findings of neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings of neglect turn almost entirely on issues of credibility that were properly resolved by Family Court after taking into account inconsistencies in the children’s statements and other evidence favorable to appellant’s position (see Matter of Carine T., 183 AD2d 902, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Orders of disposition, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about September 2 and October 13, 1998, placing two of the subject children with their father under petitioner’s supervision and placing the third subject child with petitioner for up to one year, upon findings of neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings of neglect turn almost entirely on issues of credibility that were properly resolved by Family Court after taking into account inconsistencies in the children’s statements and other evidence favorable to appellant’s position (see Matter of Carine T., 183 AD2d 902, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 A.D.2d 479, 753 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jasmine-m-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack