In Re Jasmine Jarbis v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 26, 2023·No. 01-23-00678-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued September 26, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Ltd. P’ship, No. 14-18-00761-CV, 2018 WL 4354701, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 13, 2018, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]) (mem. op.) (“Standing is an element of an appellate court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over a petition for writ of mandamus.”); In re Guardianship of Jones, No. 05-15-01510-CV, 2015 WL 9304276, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 22, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“A petitioner for mandamus relief must have standing to bring suit just as any other litigant. A relator has standing to pursue mandamus relief if the relator has a justiciable interest in the controversy.”); In re Baker, 404 S.W.3d 575, 577–78, 582 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, orig. proceeding) (considering sua sponte whether relator had standing to bring original proceeding). Relator’s mandamus petition also does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(a) (“Service on a party represented by counsel must be made on that party’s lead counsel.”), 52.3.

We deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams, and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Jasmine Jarbis v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

In Re Jasmine Jarbis v. the State of Texas (In Re Jasmine Jarbis v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

in Re James A. Baker
404 S.W.3d 575 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)