In re Jasmine De L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jasmine De L.

282 A.D.2d 333, 723 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 333 (In re Jasmine De L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jasmine De L., 282 A.D.2d 333, 723 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about April 12, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, menacing and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established every element of each of the crimes. Concur — Williams, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about April 12, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, menacing and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence clearly established every element of each of the crimes. Concur — Williams, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 333, 723 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jasmine-de-l-nyappdiv-2001.